<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Passion of the Christ &#8211; The Supposed Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Mack D. Male, an Edmonton blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolish189</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>foolish189</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>God is love&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God is love<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonshrimp</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonshrimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>wow.... i missed a lot eh mack? &lt;br&gt;Bkong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;. i missed a lot eh mack?<br />
<br />Bkong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 04:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Jesus represented love, the purest form which &lt;br&gt;is not of this earth.  His message was to let us&lt;br&gt;know that living compassionately is the only we could exist here and there after.  The various bibles  may have differences between them however the core meaning remains concrete throughout them all.  Faith, hope and love.  These three gifts &lt;br&gt;equal peace and harmony.  You either beleive in&lt;br&gt;peace and harmony or you do not.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus represented love, the purest form which<br />
<br />is not of this earth.  His message was to let us<br />
<br />know that living compassionately is the only we could exist here and there after.  The various bibles  may have differences between them however the core meaning remains concrete throughout them all.  Faith, hope and love.  These three gifts<br />
<br />equal peace and harmony.  You either beleive in<br />
<br />peace and harmony or you do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I got to this site while searching for something else on The Passion and ended up reading through the majority of the &quot;debate&quot;. I am a Christian. I just have a few things to say and I say them with love. &lt;br&gt;1) The Bible has more evidence than any other historical document. We have found approximately 25,000 complete and partial copies of the New Testament alone. That is more than any other historical book. The Iliad (second in number of manuscripts found) has only 643.&lt;br&gt;2) There are no contradictions in the Bible.&lt;br&gt;Many of the alleged contradictions come from the inability to understand the basic principles of interpreting ancient literature. &lt;br&gt;3)Jesus is love because God is love and Jesus is God.&lt;br&gt;4) God does not force punishment on people and send them to hell. People choose to go there on their own. God has provided us proof after proof that He exsists, anyone that chooses not to believe has his/her opinion respected by God. Would we want a God that forced us to believe something?&lt;br&gt;5)I am not Catholic and don&#039;t believe in purgatory, the people before Jesus&#039; time got saved by faith not by works, just as we do today. Jesus crucifixion may have occured at a certain time in history but God looks at past, present, future as one. Jesus death on the cross saved those from the past who had faith in God, just as it saved me in the future.&lt;br&gt;6)I just said above that I don&#039;t agree with my fellow Christian on here about purgatory and some people say that proves that Christianity is not true since we can&#039;t even agree. Don&#039;t blame God for our disagreements, it goes back to that choice thing.&lt;br&gt;7)I would like to ask all unbelievers out there to read Josh McDowell&#039;s book &quot;The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict&quot;. It is long but anyone who thinks there is no proof that Christianity is true should check it out. It may surprise you how much evidence there is. Christianity is a thinking person&#039;s religion. God never asks us to believe something purely on faith, He always gives a reason to believe. &lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to this site while searching for something else on The Passion and ended up reading through the majority of the &quot;debate&quot;. I am a Christian. I just have a few things to say and I say them with love.<br />
<br />1) The Bible has more evidence than any other historical document. We have found approximately 25,000 complete and partial copies of the New Testament alone. That is more than any other historical book. The Iliad (second in number of manuscripts found) has only 643.<br />
<br />2) There are no contradictions in the Bible.<br />
<br />Many of the alleged contradictions come from the inability to understand the basic principles of interpreting ancient literature.<br />
<br />3)Jesus is love because God is love and Jesus is God.<br />
<br />4) God does not force punishment on people and send them to hell. People choose to go there on their own. God has provided us proof after proof that He exsists, anyone that chooses not to believe has his/her opinion respected by God. Would we want a God that forced us to believe something?<br />
<br />5)I am not Catholic and don&#8217;t believe in purgatory, the people before Jesus&#8217; time got saved by faith not by works, just as we do today. Jesus crucifixion may have occured at a certain time in history but God looks at past, present, future as one. Jesus death on the cross saved those from the past who had faith in God, just as it saved me in the future.<br />
<br />6)I just said above that I don&#8217;t agree with my fellow Christian on here about purgatory and some people say that proves that Christianity is not true since we can&#8217;t even agree. Don&#8217;t blame God for our disagreements, it goes back to that choice thing.<br />
<br />7)I would like to ask all unbelievers out there to read Josh McDowell&#8217;s book &quot;The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict&quot;. It is long but anyone who thinks there is no proof that Christianity is true should check it out. It may surprise you how much evidence there is. Christianity is a thinking person&#8217;s religion. God never asks us to believe something purely on faith, He always gives a reason to believe.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melissa</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>There is no such thing as purgatory-where do you people get this stuff?  If you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, you are going to heaven-if you don&#039;t, you are going to hell.  You do not work off your sins. Jesus died to pay the penalty for your sins and by accepting Him you accept His blood to cover you in the sight of God when yu die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as purgatory-where do you people get this stuff?  If you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior, you are going to heaven-if you don&#8217;t, you are going to hell.  You do not work off your sins. Jesus died to pay the penalty for your sins and by accepting Him you accept His blood to cover you in the sight of God when yu die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Inge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ANYMORE SHUT THE HELL UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ANYMORE SHUT THE HELL UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Boner</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Boner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>get over it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get over it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laine</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>laine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>tee-hee! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tee-hee! <img src='http://blog.mastermaq.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laine</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>laine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>out of nowhere...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;im a 20-year old college student and do not wish to argue with any of you guys here.  i just want to point out some stuff w/c also bother me (as a sign of growing up, i guess)... it would be nice if you guys could hear me out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if there is one great thing i&#039;ve learned from studying philosophy and theology, and from analyzing my own experiences, it is this: not everything in this world is commensureable.  one cannot always compare all things as to whether they are important or not, true or not, by the same standards.  there are aspects of our lives which largely depend on concrete tangible evidence (e.g. science, in which numbers, formulas, and equations, data are compulsory), yet there are ones which mainly depend on &quot;non-something&#039;s&quot; or &quot;non-somebody&#039;s&quot;.  an example of the former would be the chemical tests (Lucas and chromic acid tests for the presence of primary and secondary alcohols).  on the other hand, a non-somebody could be explained by the ff: when you love your parents, you don&#039;t love them because of the facts about them (e.g. their names, their birthdates and -places, etc. which were only imposed on them);  you love your parents because of that something within them which could not be encompassed by given details about them... (i hope u get my point).  similarly, you do not believe in your friend due to the &quot;somebody&quot; in him/her, that &quot;somebody&quot; who can be known by thousands of other people whom he/she encounters.  you have faith in your friend because of that &quot;non-somebody&quot; in him/her who shares a special relationship with you, that &quot;non-somebody&quot; who makes you feel comfortable and proud of who you are.  this breeds faith in that friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thus, in life, although people normally are stuck in looking for answers to endless questions which need scientific proof (this is what the workaday world does to us), there are other and personally, more significant factors which we do value.  this, i think, is the basic foundation of believing, of religion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i, as a roman-catholic, respect people who do not believe. may i ask my fellow believers to try and do the same.  as for the non-believers, respect is also what we ask for in return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks, guys and God bless!&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>out of nowhere&#8230;</p>
<p>im a 20-year old college student and do not wish to argue with any of you guys here.  i just want to point out some stuff w/c also bother me (as a sign of growing up, i guess)&#8230; it would be nice if you guys could hear me out.</p>
<p>if there is one great thing i&#8217;ve learned from studying philosophy and theology, and from analyzing my own experiences, it is this: not everything in this world is commensureable.  one cannot always compare all things as to whether they are important or not, true or not, by the same standards.  there are aspects of our lives which largely depend on concrete tangible evidence (e.g. science, in which numbers, formulas, and equations, data are compulsory), yet there are ones which mainly depend on &quot;non-something&#8217;s&quot; or &quot;non-somebody&#8217;s&quot;.  an example of the former would be the chemical tests (Lucas and chromic acid tests for the presence of primary and secondary alcohols).  on the other hand, a non-somebody could be explained by the ff: when you love your parents, you don&#8217;t love them because of the facts about them (e.g. their names, their birthdates and -places, etc. which were only imposed on them);  you love your parents because of that something within them which could not be encompassed by given details about them&#8230; (i hope u get my point).  similarly, you do not believe in your friend due to the &quot;somebody&quot; in him/her, that &quot;somebody&quot; who can be known by thousands of other people whom he/she encounters.  you have faith in your friend because of that &quot;non-somebody&quot; in him/her who shares a special relationship with you, that &quot;non-somebody&quot; who makes you feel comfortable and proud of who you are.  this breeds faith in that friend.</p>
<p>thus, in life, although people normally are stuck in looking for answers to endless questions which need scientific proof (this is what the workaday world does to us), there are other and personally, more significant factors which we do value.  this, i think, is the basic foundation of believing, of religion.</p>
<p>i, as a roman-catholic, respect people who do not believe. may i ask my fellow believers to try and do the same.  as for the non-believers, respect is also what we ask for in return.</p>
<p>thanks, guys and God bless!<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>No matter what you guys say, I believe there is a God up there that watches over us and lets us learn from our mistakes and loves us. How do I know He loves us? Because without His love we would not exist. So stop debating over this. Whoever wants to believe, fine, whoever doesn&#039;t, fine with that too. So be quiet and enjoy life because, althought you guys don&#039;t think so, life it&#039;s gift, and we take it too much for granted.&lt;br&gt;By the way, the Passion of the Christ is a very good movie. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what you guys say, I believe there is a God up there that watches over us and lets us learn from our mistakes and loves us. How do I know He loves us? Because without His love we would not exist. So stop debating over this. Whoever wants to believe, fine, whoever doesn&#8217;t, fine with that too. So be quiet and enjoy life because, althought you guys don&#8217;t think so, life it&#8217;s gift, and we take it too much for granted.<br />
<br />By the way, the Passion of the Christ is a very good movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Beans, I agree with you on many points except one.  I have read the Bible throughly and in context and have never found where it says that we go to purgatory.  What I have read and studied is that salvation is received by grace thorough faith, not of our selves, it is a gift from God, not of works so that no man can boast. (Eph. 2:8,9)  I have not read the Catholic Bible. Are there passages in the extra books that mention purgatory?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another point is that the Catholic church is the original church.  The church of the book of acts is.  The origional church was set up with no intentions of denominations, Catholicism included.  So, to answer the question of which denomination is right, none are.  If there was supposed to be a specific one, Paul would have said so in the Bible.  I personally attend a non-denominational Bible college and church.  But, the fact that there are so many different denominations only adds to the validity of the Christian faith.  For the most part we all belive in the basic foudations of Christianity (one God in three parts but sill only one, the creation of the world, the forgiveness of sins through faith in Christ, there are more) A lot of the denominations a from difference in opinion in traditions and practices, but, if you just live your life based on the Bible you&#039;re fine and don&#039;t need to pick a denomination to follow.  My belief is that when all the Christinas get to heaven and ask God which one was right He&#039;ll say none, the Bible is right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as math and science.  As I said I go to a Christian college, and the prof that I had fo biology my freshman year is one of the top bio-chemists in the country and has done extensive work for the government.  He became a Christian by trying to disprove Christianity and God through science.  Many of our professors in the math department came to faith in similar ways.  My history prof is one of the few people in the world that has the highest possible acess to the dead sea scrolls and is one of the top archeologists in the world.  Again he was saved by trying to prove Christianity wrong with historical evidence.  Dickson, you are educated, but I highly doubt you are as educated as these men and women.  I know I&#039;m not and I most likely never will be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last words of Jesus are not as important as His death.  Like beans said, the two different phrases mean the same thing, Christs job on earth is over for now.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beans, I agree with you on many points except one.  I have read the Bible throughly and in context and have never found where it says that we go to purgatory.  What I have read and studied is that salvation is received by grace thorough faith, not of our selves, it is a gift from God, not of works so that no man can boast. (Eph. 2:8,9)  I have not read the Catholic Bible. Are there passages in the extra books that mention purgatory?</p>
<p>Another point is that the Catholic church is the original church.  The church of the book of acts is.  The origional church was set up with no intentions of denominations, Catholicism included.  So, to answer the question of which denomination is right, none are.  If there was supposed to be a specific one, Paul would have said so in the Bible.  I personally attend a non-denominational Bible college and church.  But, the fact that there are so many different denominations only adds to the validity of the Christian faith.  For the most part we all belive in the basic foudations of Christianity (one God in three parts but sill only one, the creation of the world, the forgiveness of sins through faith in Christ, there are more) A lot of the denominations a from difference in opinion in traditions and practices, but, if you just live your life based on the Bible you&#8217;re fine and don&#8217;t need to pick a denomination to follow.  My belief is that when all the Christinas get to heaven and ask God which one was right He&#8217;ll say none, the Bible is right.</p>
<p>As far as math and science.  As I said I go to a Christian college, and the prof that I had fo biology my freshman year is one of the top bio-chemists in the country and has done extensive work for the government.  He became a Christian by trying to disprove Christianity and God through science.  Many of our professors in the math department came to faith in similar ways.  My history prof is one of the few people in the world that has the highest possible acess to the dead sea scrolls and is one of the top archeologists in the world.  Again he was saved by trying to prove Christianity wrong with historical evidence.  Dickson, you are educated, but I highly doubt you are as educated as these men and women.  I know I&#8217;m not and I most likely never will be.</p>
<p>The last words of Jesus are not as important as His death.  Like beans said, the two different phrases mean the same thing, Christs job on earth is over for now.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>inge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>who cares! let&#039;s go to Miami and all of our discussions can have pina colada&#039;s and hot bitches on sand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares! let&#8217;s go to Miami and all of our discussions can have pina colada&#8217;s and hot bitches on sand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingofGods</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>KingofGods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll watch it as soon as I can and then read these posts and arguements</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll watch it as soon as I can and then read these posts and arguements</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickson's Blogathon</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickson's Blogathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-213</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickson's Blogathon</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2004/02/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickson's Blogathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2004/2/25/the-passion-of-the-christ-the-supposed-controversy/#comment-212</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

