<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Adobe&#8217;s decision wise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2005/04/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2005/04/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Mack D. Male, an Edmonton blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickson Wong</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2005/04/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickson Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2005/4/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Definitely some good points!  And since trackback isn&#039;t exactly working..i&#039;m going to paste a link back to my article ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; href=&quot;http://blog.dicksonwong.com/archive/2005/04/19/1176.aspx&quot;&gt;http://blog.dicksonwong.com/archive/2005/04/19/1176.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely some good points!  And since trackback isn&#8217;t exactly working..i&#8217;m going to paste a link back to my article <img src='http://blog.mastermaq.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.dicksonwong.com/archive/2005/04/19/1176.aspx">http://blog.dicksonwong.com/archive/2005/04/19/1176.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack D. Male</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2005/04/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack D. Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2005/4/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>The only reason it would be a market worth exploring for Microsoft is if Flash or PDF (though less likely) became a standard interface. Microsoft would not be happy if users entered the web through Flash instead of a web page that could be built with ASP.NET!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason it would be a market worth exploring for Microsoft is if Flash or PDF (though less likely) became a standard interface. Microsoft would not be happy if users entered the web through Flash instead of a web page that could be built with ASP.NET!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Borsato</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2005/04/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/comment-page-1/#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Borsato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2005/4/18/was-adobes-decision-wise/#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>Acrobat and Flash are mature products in stable (not growing) markets. There is no particular strategy here other than bigger must be better, and there will be downsizing to reduce costs. This really isn&#039;t a market worth chasing for Microsoft. I doubt any innovation will result here either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acrobat and Flash are mature products in stable (not growing) markets. There is no particular strategy here other than bigger must be better, and there will be downsizing to reduce costs. This really isn&#8217;t a market worth chasing for Microsoft. I doubt any innovation will result here either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

