<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes for 1/13/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2008/01/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2008/01/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Mack D. Male, an Edmonton blogger.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2008/01/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2008/1/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, until people start to see that (some) blogs are just as valuable and reputable as the mainstream media (and sometimes more so), all it will take to discredit the entire &#039;blogosphere&#039; is a single high-profile blog doing something stupid like this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully, as blogs continue to become more and more mainstream, that will stop being the case. After all, if the New York Post had done something like that, you wouldn&#039;t hear anyone claiming that newspapers couldn&#039;t be taken seriously. They&#039;d only be saying it about the Post in particular, not all papers. The same will probably be true of blogs in the very near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, until people start to see that (some) blogs are just as valuable and reputable as the mainstream media (and sometimes more so), all it will take to discredit the entire &#8216;blogosphere&#8217; is a single high-profile blog doing something stupid like this.</p>
<p>Hopefully, as blogs continue to become more and more mainstream, that will stop being the case. After all, if the New York Post had done something like that, you wouldn&#8217;t hear anyone claiming that newspapers couldn&#8217;t be taken seriously. They&#8217;d only be saying it about the Post in particular, not all papers. The same will probably be true of blogs in the very near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack D. Male</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2008/01/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5020</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack D. Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2008/1/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/#comment-5020</guid>
		<description>No worries, it was a really good series!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yep, though it sucks that everyone has started saying &quot;bloggers can&#039;t be taken seriously&quot; instead of just Gizmodo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries, it was a really good series!</p>
<p>Yep, though it sucks that everyone has started saying &quot;bloggers can&#8217;t be taken seriously&quot; instead of just Gizmodo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://blog.mastermaq.ca/2008/01/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5019</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://~/2008/1/13/notes-for-1-13-2008/#comment-5019</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, that Gizmodo stunt was pretty lame. To paraphrase one of the people who commented on the post: Gizmodo proved why they cannot be taken seriously as journalists by doing what they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, man.</p>
<p>Also, that Gizmodo stunt was pretty lame. To paraphrase one of the people who commented on the post: Gizmodo proved why they cannot be taken seriously as journalists by doing what they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

