The last session of the day that I am attending is with Mike McDerment, Chris Messina, Matt Mullenweg, and Stowe Boyd, who will be discussing whether or not they thing Web 2.0 is changing the software industry. Here are my notes (my comments in italics):
- Matt describes a web service as a web page meant for a computer.
- Mike is confusing web services and web applications maybe? What Mike means is a service like Basecamp, where users pay a monthly fee to use the service.
- Stowe likes the term/phrase, “the freemium model”, where base capabilites are free and you turn on a for fee model after some limit is hit. I like the phrase too, and the business model. It’s a natural way that people get hooked and then like a service so much they’ll pay.
- Matt points out that a nice thing about these services is that you don’t have to worry about security, or upgrades, or any of that sort of thing.
- The significance of consuming apps online instead of in a shrinkwrapped way, is huge, according to Stowe. Products will get much better, much more quickly. It’s like the difference between American Airlines and JetBlue.
- Matt thinks the unsexy name for freemium is shareware, and it’s been around for a while. The difference now is that we have broadband.
- Chris thinks wifi is also a huge change, and that we have laptops everywhere.
- In three years, Stowe thinks the software landscape will look increasingly web-based. People will have connectivity all the time, on increasingly more capable mobile devices.
- What Chris wants to see is interfaces and interactions with software that translates into something real.
- People are the center of the universe, not data, not information. Stowe thinks the buddy list is the most important metaphor for the future. He says RSS aggregators follow the wrong model, we don’t need bits of information coming through a pipe, but instead we want to know what Chris has written lately, for example.
- Good question from the audience about innovation exhaustion, what happens after the 38th signal? How do these web apps become useful for real people?
- Stowe: another trend, small companies.
- If you can make things intuitive, you wont have as many people bug you, says Matt.
- Chis says microformats is an area he’s been doing a lot of work right now.
- Matt says at the end of the day, formats and standards don’t matter. He says they should arise afterward as codifications of market trends. All of the great standards were not written first, but followed an existing market trend.
- Stowe says we don’t need a replacement for Office on the web.
- Stowe thinks apps with the social stuff built in will be the most successful Web 2.0 apps.
- The “social architecture approach”, look at the social stuff during design.
Very interesting session, lots to think about after this one.