Google made an interesting post to their official blog yesterday, titled Do you “Google?” which aside from being extremely calculated and condescending, slightly mocks Yahoo (you know, do you Yahoo?). The post explains that you can’t use “google” and “search” interchangeably, because they don’t want to become genericized like so many other names have (elevator, zipper, etc).
Needless to say, the post sucks. I can’t say it any better than Ben Metcalfe:
But in the end, regardless of whether it’s positive, harmful or somewhat in between for Google, I for one don’t like to be told how to use the English language.
We own our language. So Google, you can go shove your lexicographical ‘advice’ up your ass.
Seriously, go read Ben’s entire post. He does an awesome job of deconstructing the Google post. The Yahoo search team have posted their own comments too.
I understand the need to try and protect your trademarks and other intellectual property, but I am not sure going after the public like this is a good idea. Google should stick to going after organizations and publications which abuse their trademarks. You need to prove that you’ve made every effort to protect your trademark, but going after individuals is never a good idea. Just ask the RIAA.
If “google” turns out to be a generic term in the end, so be it.
Read: Ben Metcalfe
MasterMaq's Blog 
I agree, that post by "a Google employee" came off as really arrogant to me. Does Microsoft complain when someone says "my friend MSN’ed me today"?
Google needs to take a page out of Microsoft’s book and let their employees run their own blogs instead of telling them what to say (and what not to say in this case) through the Google blog.
Everybody seems to have thier panties in a knot over this.
How could Google have handled this delicate issue any better?
They *do* have a tradmark to protect.
They could have handled it better by not going after Joe Public, like I said.