Today I launched a website at www.everybodyinthiscityisarmed.com that highlights the sensational media coverage we’ve seen lately about homicides in Edmonton in the hopes that we can change the discussion for the better. At 34 and counting, there’s no question that we’re in a bad situation and that if we don’t take action (we already have) we could be on track for a record number of murders this year. I don’t think that is going to happen however, and I wrote about why back in early July. I see the new website as a continuation of that effort. Hopefully it’s a call to action for local media, to go from simply recording what has happened and lamenting the growing number to digging into why it has happened and what we can do about it. I hope it’s also a call to action for Edmontonians, to demand more meaningful coverage of crime in our city.
Over the weekend I saw people like Andy tweeting a link to this Canoe.ca article. The discussion seemed to pick up again yesterday, with Jeff’s discussion in the headlines and more tweeting from people like Adam. Lots of people were mentioning Bill Pitt, a criminologist at Grant MacEwan University. I started copying down some of his quotes and made notes beside them, based on research I had already done. One thing led to another, and after a few hours I had registered the domain and put up the web page. I asked Jeff, Sally, and Adam for their thoughts and ideas, and via email they helped me improve it. Sally did the logo and header, while Jeff and Adam helped me tweak the content and layout.
The page started out very focused on Bill Pitt, for a few reasons. He has said some absolutely outlandish things, perhaps most of all the statement “everybody in this city is armed.” I thought that phrase captured the sensationalism very well, so that’s why I went with it for the domain. I also focused on Pitt because I realized that all of the quotes I had copied down were easily refuted. Over the course of the evening however, the page became a little less focused on Pitt specifically and more on local media coverage in general. As I said in an interview with iNews880’s Brittney LeBlanc today, “it’s not really about Bill Pitt, it’s about going beyond the quote, and the easy number, and the easy stat, and getting into a little more about why.”
I think there are so many questions we could be discussing to get a better understanding of the situation in which we find ourselves. I have included some of them on the website. Why has Montreal’s homicide rate declined so steadily since 1981 and what we can learn from that? How is 2011 similar to 2005/2006, the last time we had a spike in homicides? Why did our homicide rate drop so significantly after 1992? These are questions that take work to start to answer. It takes research, digging into the archives, talking to the right people. I started with the numbers, and I’ll do what I can to go beyond. I hope others will join me in that quest.
It will be obvious to longtime readers, but it’s worth mentioning that I rarely write about crime. I don’t mention it in my weekly notes, nor do I link to crime-related stories on Edmonton Etcetera. Crime is always on the front page of the newspaper and in the first few minutes of the newscast. It doesn’t need any more coverage. So why have I decided to get involved? Because I care about Edmonton. I think the sensational reporting has gotten out of hand, and I think the media’s thoughtfulness about the issue has simply not grown along with the body count.
Even if this outrageous spike – 33 homicides in the first 30 weeks of 2011 compared to 27 at year’s end in both 2009 and 2010 – hasn’t created a climate of fear on Edmonton’s streets, it is establishing an unseemly image of our city that is being broadcast and published the world over and will not be easily shed.
That’s what the Edmonton Journal published today, and they’re absolutely right. I’m not denying the numbers, but I am saying there’s a lot more to crime in Edmonton than 34 homicides in 2011.
I don’t really have any plans for the website, so I’d love to hear your suggestions. Karen asked about comments today, so I added Disqus to the page. How do you think it should evolve? Does it have life beyond today, or is it a single-serving website?
More importantly, what would make the discussion better for you? What’s missing from recent coverage about homicides in Edmonton? And what do you know that others need to know? Let’s have a better discussion about crime in our city.
11 thoughts on “A better discussion about crime in Edmonton”
…it is eerily familiar to living in Montreal during the biker wars…I think this kind of crime Edmonton is experiencing is more about drug turf than anything.
I definitely think some comparisons to Montreal and an exploration of what has happened in that city might help us. Thanks!
This is highly correlated with the boom-bust cycle of this town. As more people come in, more murders will happen. So it is not quite of the same nature as Winnipeg, it is borne out of good news.
“As more people come in, more murders will happen. So it is not quite of the same nature as Winnipeg, it is borne out of good news.”
That is about as far a stretch as I could imagine to rationalize something. If good times = murder, then the bodies must be piling up in Calgary, no?
The question regarding Calgary hinges on whether then are any upgraders being built in its vicinity, which would attract uprooted folk from the Atlantic provinces out to make a fast buck. There’s a difference in Calgary: they count the money in there, they dont drink it. That is why I say the clue lies in the demographics of the city. But it seems the local ‘gliteratti’ wish Kim Krushell, Bill Pitt, and the outgoing police chief to shut up. If that is so what to do about it? Well, certainly erecting tents to sing ‘kumbaya’ is not the way to go.
At the end of the day, downtown is still sketchy, which is why real estate prices are much lower compared to across the river in Strathcona
Good points from the Journal’s Gunter (a rare occassion when I agree with him):
In Waterloo Region we have a Crime Prevention Council (much like Reach Edmonton) that among other things is similarly observing the impact of reporting on public experiences and decision making. I commend you for wanting to draw attention to the broader data and the research and above all for challenging media to ask the right questions such as: how might this have been prevented? If interested in checking us out: http://www.preventingcrime.ca or http://www.smartoncrime.ca. Christiane Sadeler (Executive Director)
Remember when Mike Boyd said there are no gangs in Edmonton?