Reading that we’ve had 28 murders so far this year in Edmonton is disheartening, as others have noted. And without a doubt something needs to be done to understand why this happening and what we can do to stop it. But has the picture really changed all that much from previous years?
Our homicide rate (the number of homicides per 100,000 people) currently sits at roughly 2.41. That compares to Winnipeg’s 2.08 (they have had 16 murders so far this year). If we extrapolate for the rest of the year, we’d finish with a homicide rate of roughly 4.82. That would indeed be our highest ever. However, a rate that high has only been experienced in large cities twice in the last 30 years:
Given that history, I would be shocked if we finished 2011 with a homicide rate above 4.8 (which would equate to 56 murders).
Here’s the average homicide rate for each of those cities:
And here’s what the rate looks like from year to year (it appears Montréal has experienced the most steady decline – we should find out what they did):
As for the title of Murder Capital of Canada – that distinction clearly goes to Winnipeg. It has led large cities in murders more in the last 30 years than any other:
In recent years, it has generally been Winnipeg #1 and Edmonton #2, or vice versa.
It sounds bad: “we’ve had more murders in the first six months of 2011 than we did all of last year”. That’s the kind of statement that will spur us into action. But I don’t think the situation is really all that different from previous years.
The other negative side effect of all of this is the knock on Edmonton’s image throughout Canada and around the world. Countless stories have been written about our homicide rate. I was interviewed by CTV about this today. I said that the words ‘homicide’ and ‘murder’ have been mentioned by Edmontonians on Twitter about 1200 times in the last month or so. What I didn’t get to do in the interview was compare that to previous years:
The absolute number of mentions is higher this year than it was in the last two years, but so is the total number of tweets overall. So I normalized the data. If the same number of tweets had been posted in June 2009 as were posted in June 2011, the words ‘homicide’ and ‘murder’ would have been mentioned more two years ago than today. All this to say: Edmontonians are talking about this topic, but perhaps not more than they have in the past. I would guess that other Canadians are talking about our homicide rate more than is normal, however.
UPDATE (8/5/2011): I updated the second paragraph to better reflect the way Statistics Canada calculates homicide rates, so that the numbers better align with the rest of the post. I had originally stated that extrapolating for the rest of 2011 would result in a homicide rate above 5.0, when it should have been 4.8. My argument remains the same – statistically speaking, that is very unlikely.
17 thoughts on “Edmonton’s Homicide Rate: How much has changed in 30 years?”
Thanks for putting together those statistics. My personal reaction to the high murder rate in 2011 is that it’s one year, and does not a trend make. I’m not a fan of using twitter to gauge the public discourse, but I can see the point you’re trying to make.
Yeah Twitter is a pretty specific snapshot, but I think it does help to illustrate the point.
How does Ottawa compare?
Ottawa is a little tricky because Ottawa and Gatineau are calculated separately. Overall though, the rate is quite low. Here are some examples:
Ottawa in 2009: 1.08
Gatineau in 2009: 0.66
Ottawa in 2008: 1.20
Gatineau in 2008: 1.35
On the whole I’d say it is more or less on par with Vancouver and Calgary.
I find it odd that we have a “Homicide Rate” that has been calculated out but we seem to forget the fact that people have died.
Flat expression of numbers is one thing, but… people are dead.
I don’t think anyone has forgotten that people have died. Just look at the newspaper or watch the evening news. Murders are covered more than adequately. What I’m trying to do here is add some perspective to the “crisis” that we seem to be in.
I am curious if a good deal of these homicides are the result of mobs dealing with each other with respect to territorial matters in the sale of drugs.
Thanks for putting this together. Still in the news several weeks later, although like you I can’t imagine it exceeding 5.0 (although it might be close). It’s interesting that Montreal has had the steadiest decline since it has also been the site of war between biker gangs.
Well done. Any numbers to compare with economic growth?
There are obvious demographic reasons for these murder/violence trends too. It’s a demographic reality shared by Vancouver & Winnipeg too but unfortunately there is little political will to tackle it. That said, great article Mack! You’re a real asset to Edmonton!
Thanks for compiling and analyzing these complex data from Statistics Canada. I have a great interest doing learning more about this topic. I was wondering if you could provide links for the original source of the Statistics Canada data/report.
Thanks for reading! The source is CANSIM, so it’s not free: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a05?id=2530004&pattern=homicide&stByVal=1&paSer=&lang=eng
I was surprised at the political hysteria I found online. Torontonians were seemingly delighted to prove out a ‘redneck’s and guns’ theory they seem to be trying to fit with TV perceptions maybe? Some Vancouverites happy to ‘cancel out’ their issues by pointing to another wrong. Hostile stuff! But you put this in a clearer perspective. My goal is Edmonton with the lowest rates so I’m wildly disappointed but this does show us where to be realistic.