I’m registered to speak during tomorrow’s non-statutory public hearing on the Food & Agriculture Strategy. I’m looking forward to the opportunity to share my thoughts with Executive Committee (though I expect we’ll see more than just the five standing members in attendance). I’m yet to hear anyone on Council say they are looking forward to it, however.
“If you own the land and you want to grow berries, go ahead. If you don’t own the land, I would say the same thing, get the heck out of the way. You have no interest. We’re going to have everybody with no interest, financially or otherwise, coming forward supporting something that they really have no skin in the game about, and those that do, are going to suffer the consequences.”
That was what Councillor Caterina said at the September 5 meeting of Executive Committee, voicing his opposition to the public hearing (ultimately he did vote for it along with the rest of the Committee).
No interest? No skin in the game? Councillor Caterina could not be more wrong, and let me tell you why.
First of all, we’re talking about the Food & Agriculture Strategy, not the “What To Do With Land In The Northeast Strategy.” Food is something that touches all of us, and if we’re going to take a position as a City on the importance of food to our community, I want a say in that.
I think we screwed up by attaching the Food & Agriculture Strategy to the specific land issue in the northeast. I want a WinterCity Strategy-like approach to food. There is so much that was left unexplored, and so many people that were not involved that have important, valuable contributions to make, and that’s largely because the discussion was dominated by the northeast.
Secondly, Council is largely responsible for turning this into the “What To Do With Land In The Northeast Strategy.”
I have not seen any concrete evidence to suggest that we can sustain our outward growth, nor have I seen any concrete evidence to suggest we can’t. There’s lots of anecdotal information, and certainly there are dozens of other places we can point to that clearly demonstrate the unsustainability of sprawl, but we need facts and figures for Edmonton. We need to know, for every unit of housing we add into new areas, what that costs the city. We need to know, for every unit of housing we add into existing areas, what that costs the city. Then we can start to determine whether or not we can afford to move ahead with more sprawl. My educated guess is that we can’t.
We should have had those numbers from the Integrated Infrastructure Management Plan (IIMP) and the Growth Coordination Strategy (GCS), but that’s not going to happen. In September, Administration asked for the IIMP to be treated as a “framework” rather than a plan, then provided a meaningless two-page document to serve as the framework. Council let them get away with it.
The GCS is slated to go to Council on November 19. A draft was released in May, but it has been rewritten and was distributed to select stakeholders at the end of the day on Tuesday. The deadline for comments? Tomorrow. And beyond that select group, there has been zero public consultation, and there’s no indication that a public hearing will be held for the GCS. The purpose of the GCS is to “manage future public obligations and growth opportunities” so can you guess what was removed from the latest draft? Anything related to mature areas, transit oriented development, and infill. So much for the “coordination” part of our growth strategy.
As our elected representatives, Council should be the ones asking why. Why do we still lack the information we need to make smart decisions? Why have we rushed these documents? Why haven’t we included the public in their creation?
In short, Council has not provided citizens with confidence that we can grow sustainably, nor have they provided opportunities for citizens to have a say on the plans that will affect where and how we grow. The only opportunity we have is the Food & Agriculture Strategy.
Thirdly, and most importantly, I pay taxes like everyone else. It costs money to provide services to an ever-expanding list of neighbourhoods, and that means there is upward pressure on my taxes. Police stations, libraries, and parks do not build themselves. There are no magic fairies that remove snow in the winter or fix potholes in the summer. Taxes pay for those civic services.
I have an interest in ensuring Edmonton’s food security because food is central to my everyday life. I have an interest in what happens in the northeast because I have an interest in living in a sustainable city. I have “skin in the game” because I pay taxes like everyone else. And above all, I as a citizen of Edmonton, have a right to be involved in decisions that affect me.
5 thoughts on “We all have skin in the game”
Don’t want to date myself, but ‘right on!’. One thing I am hopeful about is the many fantastic people I have met during this process. Perhaps someday the face of council will reflect the spirit of the people! I have been doing a lot of wishing, hoping and dreaming…
Glad you can speak for these issues. The problem is Council thinks the issue is about a bunch of hippies doing their thing, meanwhile believing they must advance the interests of the powerful land speculation machine that is driven by global financial interests and pension funds. Same forces are behind the GCS.
Well said. I didn’t want to just talk about land use tomorrow, but you’re right that Council and Admin’s management of the process has forced the issue.
Standing Ovation, Mack!!!!
Food security?, Our farmers have tons of food for us to eat as long as you like canola, wheat and beef. Food is big business now and the fact of the matter is unless you can grow it yourself, put away a supply, or know someone, then you are dependent on the grocery store. The grocery store depends on fuel and electricity, take either one away and within days there will start to be hungry people, not to mention the problems with water…
If one really wants a serious discussion about food security and urban sprawl, good luck with that, the city will continue to grow as long as there are the people with money to grow it and the farmers who are on the city limits will sell out for big bucks and retire, or become a holdout who gets expropiated and buys another farm, or so we hope.
Look in your cupboards and ask yourself how long you could survive, maybe we will have a real discussion on food security.